This HIV email issue
My view on this HIV Email notification issue.
Too little, too late, by far.
The foundation purpose of any society is to provide safety and protection to its members. From the beginning of this HIV issue, there have been those squalling morons that have worked to turn this into a life style issue. It is not, was not, never will be. It is a safety issue.
The mindless rant-o-chanters, dumbass snot gobblers and other forms of libernazi idiocracy have forced us all to have to consider what should be a life affirming act as a possibly life ending action.
Any person contracting HIV by what ever means that believes their right to assuage their gonads supercedes other peoples right to live is devoid of even the most basic concepts of right and wrong and is a life threatening danger to others. Such persons should be treated as the dangers that they are.
The only time that would be modified is in situations of marrage..but only and unless the spouse was notified by their infected partner. The spouse should have the option of remaining true to the marrage, come what may. Otherswise, having sex while infected with HIV is, for all intents and purposes, at the very least, reckless indangerment, even if the non married partner knows about infection. If HIV is transmitted, then it's murder.
- Grimmy
Too little, too late, by far.
The foundation purpose of any society is to provide safety and protection to its members. From the beginning of this HIV issue, there have been those squalling morons that have worked to turn this into a life style issue. It is not, was not, never will be. It is a safety issue.
The mindless rant-o-chanters, dumbass snot gobblers and other forms of libernazi idiocracy have forced us all to have to consider what should be a life affirming act as a possibly life ending action.
Any person contracting HIV by what ever means that believes their right to assuage their gonads supercedes other peoples right to live is devoid of even the most basic concepts of right and wrong and is a life threatening danger to others. Such persons should be treated as the dangers that they are.
The only time that would be modified is in situations of marrage..but only and unless the spouse was notified by their infected partner. The spouse should have the option of remaining true to the marrage, come what may. Otherswise, having sex while infected with HIV is, for all intents and purposes, at the very least, reckless indangerment, even if the non married partner knows about infection. If HIV is transmitted, then it's murder.
- Grimmy
posted by Grimmy at 00:15
1 Comments:
Amen to that and well said! -Roms
Post a Comment
<< Home